Intelligence between the key Five Eyes alliance – United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand – has strong conviction that goes against claims made by President Donald Trump over the course of previous weeks of “biological warfare material gone wrong” conspiracy theory.
Yes, the virus is much more likely to have originated from wildlife markets rather than a virus lab in Wuhan.
“We think it’s highly unlikely it was an accident.
It is highly likely it was naturally occurring and that the human infection was from natural human and animal interaction.” said one involved diplomat. “The countries in the Five Eyes intelligence-sharing coalition are coalescing around this assessment.
”A second official, from another Five Eyes country, backed up the claims made by the former. However, the United States, the central axis to the Five Eyes intelligence coalition, has yet to ascertain this piece of information as their official statement.
This intelligence carries one of the most significant weights throughout the whole industry, as this coalition of Western countries prove to be one of the strongest alliances and espionage network there is.
President Trump now faces the burden of explaining the contrary to this particular assessment, while carrying the burden of proof for the claims he has made numerous times in the past.
A third informant has come out to the media saying that the certitude both Trump and Secretary of State Pompeo exerts is beyond comprehension, ” way out in front of where the current Five Eyes assessment is.” Although this informant still left some spaces for the availability that the virus still might have come out from the labs, he warned of any hasty statements or speech-giving by the two.
He has added that whatever the future events from the onset might have been, it is “clearly the market is where it exploded from.
” The spreading process remains unclear. The first informant and diplomat has said that without the Chinese cooperation and information available, the certainty that they can gather is very limited. The third source also pondered if the “US is not sharing all of its intelligence.
” That might have led the US to keep their confidence in saying those remarks.
If you liked this article, please LIKE SHARE AND COMMENT below! And don’t forget to check our other articles along the way!
Replaced!